However, Farhadi revealed the high-profile, real-life couple will “not necessarily” play an on-screen couple in the Spanish-language feature, ISNA reported.
“Once again there are different couples in my film, not only one,” Farhadi told Screen, of what is a recurring theme of his work.
“The film is again about family and family relationships. But there are also some new aspects in it. Yes [Cruz and Bardem] are in the film but they are not necessarily a couple in the film.”
The non-Spanish speaker said he has written the script for the new film in Farsi and it has been translated into Spanish. “I don’t speak Spanish,” he explained via a translator. “But I have time between now and the shoot to at least become more familiar with the music of the film and do my best.”
The filmmaker, who previously shot The Past in French, said making the film in a foreign language wouldn’t compromise his vision.
“I don’t feel the change of language changes your voice,” he suggested. “[My voice is an] empathy with all the characters, a level of compassion that is general.”
As with all Farhadi’s films, few further details are known about the new feature, except that it is being produced by Pedro and Agustin Almodovar’s El Deseo and sold by Memento Film.
Farhadi was speaking as a guest of the Doha Film Institute’s Qumra film event where he also presented a master-class to first and second-time filmmakers via Skype from Spain on Tuesday.
The wide-ranging discussion with Columbia University’s Richard Pena included how Farhadi requires extensive rehearsal time with his cast, how he believes screenwriting begins with an unconscious thought and the revelation he reads books more than he watches films.
“Nowadays there are more remarkable books than there are remarkable films,” said Farhadi. “There used to be more of good films and there are still a few but it’s less the case than in literature. I feel cinema is tending to certain uniformity; the films are more or less similar, whereas in literature there is more diversity”.
Farhadi in a separate interview with VARIETY said about his feelings about winning second Oscar.
“I had already won an Oscar for “A Separation,” but it was a little different this time. I have a different distributor, Amazon [and Cohen Media Group], and I had less reason to go to the U.S. to do promotion there. The film was already well known, people had already seen it. However, I originally intended to go to the ceremony that was my first intention. Then because of the travel ban, I made a decision not to go and to watch the ceremony online. It’s been pointed out that political considerations [connected to the Trump travel ban] may have tarnished the value of your artistic accomplishment in winning a second Oscar. In other words, those Academy voters may have felt driven to vote for “The Salesman” to protest against the ban. The film was on its own journey before all this happened. I have no control over what happened afterward, and for myself, I can say there was no calculation. I just reacted spontaneously to the travel ban and to what I thought about it and that’s why I decided not to go. As far as making conjectures on what criteria persuaded people to vote for it or not, it’s quite complicated. I don’t know how one could know why voters chose the film.” he said.